Legal Opinion

Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1936PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

Defendant New York Transit and Terminal Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “ terminal company ”), is the wholly-owned subsidiary of defendant Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (hereinafter referred to as the “ railroad ”). Plaintiff is the assignee of an English corporation, Connolly, Shaw & Co., Ltd., which, in January, 1929, loaned £50,000 sterling to Libertus Van Bokkelen (hereinafter referred to as “ Libertus ”) upon the promissory note of Libertus and of his brother, Walter Van Bokkelen (hereinafter referred to as “Walter”). On May 14, 1930, this plaintiff recovered judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. United States v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Dushane v. BeallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Fisser v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. American Protein Corporation v. Ab Volvo and Volvo Lastvagnar Ab, as Successors in Interest to Beijerinvest Ab, Beijer Industries, Inc. And Bo LyckeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. James Papa v. Katy Industries, Inc. And Walsh Press Company, Inc., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Gjhsrt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API