Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Santa Barbara, Ventura & San Luis Obispo, Inc. v. City of Santa Maria

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1993No. B063569PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Here, we hold that a governmental entity and its agents may not offer a grant of public funds on condition that the recipient waive the constitutional right to privacy. We thus agree with the trial court which found that defendants, City of Santa Maria (City), its mayor, and city council, could not impose a grant restriction that conditioned the receipt of public funds upon the recipient’s agreement not to provide abortion services. (Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers (1981) 29 Cal.3d 252, 284-285 [172 Cal.Rptr. 866, 625 P.2d 779, 20 A.L.R.4th 1118].) We also…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flannery v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Blanchard v. DirecTV, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Pardee Construction Co. v. Insurance of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Donchin v. GuerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Campbell v. Scripps BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API