Legal Opinion

King v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 17, 1968No. 949PublishedCited by 1,255 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren

Alabama, together with every other State, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, and Guam, participates in the Federal Government’s Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) program, which was established by the Social Security Act of 1935.1 49 Stat. 620, as amended, 42 U. S. C. §§301-1394. This appeal presents the question whether a regulation of the Alabama Department of Pensions and Security, employed in that Department’s administration of the State’s federally funded AFDC program, is consistent with Subchapter IV of the Social Security Act, 42 U. S. C. §§ 601-609,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Damico v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,255 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

1,250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API