Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Scripps Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 2000No. D030864PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, Acting P. J.
Leon E. Campbell, Richard K. Livett and Robert J. Hill (collectively Campbell) appeal a judgment for Scripps Bank entered after the trial court granted its motion for summary judgment on the basis Campbell is collaterally estopped from prosecuting the action. Campbell contends the action is not barred by collateral estoppel; Scripps Bank should be equitably estopped from asserting collateral estoppel; there exist triable issues of material fact; and the attorney fees award under Civil Code section 1717 was erroneous. As we shall explain, because we conclude Scripps…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Roos v. RedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Alki Partners, LP v. DB Fund Services, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Mills v. U.S. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- M. Perez Co. v. Base Camp Condominiums Ass'n No. OneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Smith v. EXXON MOBIL OIL CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.