Legal Opinion
Rust v. Sullivan
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 23, 1991No. 89-1391PublishedCited by 1,278 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
These cases concern a facial challenge to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations which limit *178the ability of Title X fund recipients to engage in abortion-related activities. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the regulations, finding them to be a permissible construction of the statute as well as consistent with the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. We granted certiorari to resolve a split among the Courts of Appeals.1 We affirm.
I
A
In 1970, Congress enacted Title X of the Public Health Service Act (Act), 84 Stat. 1506, as amended,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,278 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
1,273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.