Legal Opinion

Pardee Construction Co. v. Insurance of the West

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 2000No. D031946PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether insurers that have issued commercial general liability (CGL) policies to subcontractors, including completed operations coverage as to projects completed before their inception, owe a duty to defend the additionally insured general contractor in third party litigation asserting its vicarious liability for their acts. Here, where the insurers acknowledge the subcontractors had such completed operations coverage for the project that gave rise to the underlying litigation, we conclude that absent language excluding such…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Total Call International, Inc. v. Perless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Qualcomm, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Weitz Co., LLC v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Hartford Ins. Co. v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API