Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel Parks
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 2021No. 2016AP000085-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2021 WI 10
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP85-D COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Daniel Parks, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent, v. Daniel Parks, Respondent-Appellant. DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PARKS OPINION FILED: February 11, 2021 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES: Per Curiam. HAGEDRON, J., dissents, joined by REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. NOT PARTICIPATING: ATTORNEYS: For the respondent-appellant, there were briefs filed by Daniel Parks, Peyton B. Engel, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lathrop v. DonohueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against GralWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against HyndmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel ParksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel ParksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021