Legal Opinion
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Schlieve
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 2010No. 1997AP3862-DPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) appeals Referee Russell Hanson's report and recommendation that Attorney Nancy A. Schlieve's license to practice law in Wisconsin be reinstated. The OLR argues the referee erroneously concluded Attorney Schlieve met her burden to show, by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence, that her medical incapacity has been removed and that she is fit to resume the practice of law.
¶ 2. Because we conclude Attorney Schlieve has not met her burden under SCR 22.36(6) to show by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence that she is currently fit to resume…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Fiedler v. Wisconsin SenateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. WoodardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. ChavezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. LinehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Godfrey Y. MuwongeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.