Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Widule
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. PER CURIAM.
We review, pursuant to SCR 22.33(3),1 the report and recommendation of the referee, James J. Winiarski, in favor of reinstating the license of Attorney John C. Widule to practice law in Wisconsin. After conducting our review of the matter, we agree that Attorney Widule's license should be reinstated and that he should be required to follow a payment plan for paying a sanction judgment previously entered by a circuit court and the cost awards related to his disciplinary and reinstatement proceedings in this court. We modify, however, the payment plan proposed by the referee.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against GralWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KrombachWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. WoodardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary K. BiesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary K. BiesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016