Legal Opinion
Dickey v. Kuhn
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1932No. Docket No. 8028PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The litigation between the above parties, of which this action is a part, arose out of an agreement relating to the sale of a restaurant in Berkeley on or about July 24, 1922. The plaintiff executed to the defendant A. Kuhn (who will be hereinafter referred to as the defendant) the following instrument:
“Sold this day to A. Kuhn the following described property: the certain lease, fixtures and equipment and stock on hand on the date of consummation of sale, located at 2242 Telegraph avenue, Berkeley, California, for $5,000. Terms, $1,500 cash; balance in six months without interest;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Harmon v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Doll v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Dickey v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bullock v. Consumers' Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Cowlin v. PringleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Duran v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.