Harmon v. Hopkins
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEY, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered by the court sitting without a jury, in a trial held ¡after plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial had been denied.
This appeal presents just one question, viz., did the court err in denying plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial?
On March 21, 1929, the attorney for the plaintiffs wrote the clerk of San Diego County asking if it was necessary to make a deposit for jury fees at the time of filing the memorandum of motion to set this cause for trial and on March 25th received from the clerk a reply…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ferrea v. ChabotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Royal Grocery Co. v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by24 opinions
- Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Gonzales v. NorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Taylor v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.