Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Hopkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1931No. Docket No. 451PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered by the court sitting without a jury, in a trial held ¡after plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial had been denied.

This appeal presents just one question, viz., did the court err in denying plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial?

On March 21, 1929, the attorney for the plaintiffs wrote the clerk of San Diego County asking if it was necessary to make a deposit for jury fees at the time of filing the memorandum of motion to set this cause for trial and on March 25th received from the clerk a reply…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferrea v. ChabotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Royal Grocery Co. v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Gonzales v. NorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Taylor v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API