Legal Opinion

Hill v. Peres

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 1934No. Docket No. 8809PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OGDEN, J., pro tem.

This is an action for damages brought by the administrator of her estate for the death of Johanna Hill, which is claimed to have resulted from the negligence of both appellants. The cause was tried with a jury, which returned its verdict against both appellants in the sum of $15,000. Both appellants have separately appealed from the judgment entered thereon, each contending that he was not negligent and that even though negligent his negligence was not a proximate cause of the death.

About 10 o’clock P. M., on the evening of January 2'4, 1932, the deceased was riding in the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Sawyer v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Maddux v. DonaldsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Evans v. FarmerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Eramdjian v. Interstate Bakery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API