Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Cameron

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1954No. Civ. 20078PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

This action for an injunction and damages was before the Supreme Court on a former appeal by defendant Cameron. The judgment was affirmed in part and reversed in part with instructions (38 Cal.2d 265 [239 P.2d 625]). The cause was remanded for further proceedings (p. 270). Such proceedings were had pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court, and following a judgment against defendant for damages, he again appeals.

The first point to be considered is the refusal of the trial court to grant defendant’s demand for a jury trial. At the first trial, the parties waived trial by jury. Following…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Pacific Western Oil Co. v. Bern Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Guttinger v. Calaveras Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bullard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Houston v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Moylan v. DykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Modine Mfg. Co. v. ABC Radiator, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Nitram Chemicals, Inc. v. ParkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API