Spaulding v. Cameron
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
This action for an injunction and damages was before the Supreme Court on a former appeal by defendant Cameron. The judgment was affirmed in part and reversed in part with instructions (38 Cal.2d 265 [239 P.2d 625]). The cause was remanded for further proceedings (p. 270). Such proceedings were had pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court, and following a judgment against defendant for damages, he again appeals.
The first point to be considered is the refusal of the trial court to grant defendant’s demand for a jury trial. At the first trial, the parties waived trial by jury. Following…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Pacific Western Oil Co. v. Bern Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Guttinger v. Calaveras Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bullard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Houston v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Moylan v. DykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Modine Mfg. Co. v. ABC Radiator, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Nitram Chemicals, Inc. v. ParkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.