Dickey v. Kuhn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, J., pro tem.
John Dickey contracted to sell to A. Kuhn a restaurant for the agreed purchase price of $5,000. Dickey received $500 in cash and three promissory notes, executed and delivered by Kuhn and his wife to Dickey, the first for $500, the second for $500 and the third for $3,500. The last note was dated July 31, 1922, and payable January. 31, 1923. Kuhn took possession of the res taurant and paid the first $500 lióte. Prior to the due date of the second note Kuhn and his wife commenced a suit to cancel the notes, etc., upon the grounds of fraud and misrepresentation and failure of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Ladd & Tilton v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Allen v. ChatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ersa Grae Corp. v. Fluor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Glatt v. Bank of Kirkwood PlazaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Lloyd v. KleefischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Walnut Creek Pipe Distributors, Inc. v. Gates Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.