Legal Opinion

Cowlin v. Pringle

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1941No. Civ. 12547PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant, William A. Pringle, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident in which such injuries are alleged to have occurred as a result of the concurrent negligence of respondent herein and various other defendants named in the complaint. After issue had been joined through the filing of answers by all defendants the plaintiff, appellant herein, caused the case to be set for trial by filing with the court a written memorandum for setting for trial. In this written memorandum, which is supplied by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Conneau v. GeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Stern v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Bieser v. DaviesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. In Re WinchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API