Richert v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCary, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action against the City of San Diego to quiet title to certain land within the city limits of the City of San Diego. The complaint contains the usual averments. The answer denies plaintiff’s ownership and right to possession and admits that the defendant claims a right to the property in question.
The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. The court found that plaintiff was the owner in possession and entitled to the possession of the property in question; that defendant claimed title to said property, but that the same was without right. Judgment was given…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Teschemacher v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Imperial Beach v. AlgertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Lagar v. EricksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hellerud v. HauckIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.