Monceret v. Board of Professional Responsibility
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.
in which DROWOTA, BIRCH, BARKER, and HOLDER, JJ., joined.
This is an appeal from the Knox County Chancery Court, which affirmed a hearing panel’s ruling that the appellant violated Tenn.R .Sup.Ct. 8, DR 7-104(A)(l) by deposing a witness that he knew to be represented by counsel. We hold that the chancery court correctly determined that the term “party” used in DR 7-104(A)(l) is not limited to the named plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit and may also include a witness who is represented by counsel. We further hold that the protection of the Rule cannot be waived by the party but only by…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Janet Marie Hill v. St. Louis UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, United States of America v. Jose Orlando LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- People v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Davey Mann v. Alpha Tau Omega FraternityTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Nieves v. OPA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James M. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Parker v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SartiniOhio Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.