Legal Opinion

Monceret v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2000No. E1999-00545-SC-R3-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.

in which DROWOTA, BIRCH, BARKER, and HOLDER, JJ., joined.

This is an appeal from the Knox County Chancery Court, which affirmed a hearing panel’s ruling that the appellant violated Tenn.R .Sup.Ct. 8, DR 7-104(A)(l) by deposing a witness that he knew to be represented by counsel. We hold that the chancery court correctly determined that the term “party” used in DR 7-104(A)(l) is not limited to the named plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit and may also include a witness who is represented by counsel. We further hold that the protection of the Rule cannot be waived by the party but only by…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Janet Marie Hill v. St. Louis UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, United States of America v. Jose Orlando LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. People v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davey Mann v. Alpha Tau Omega FraternityTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Nieves v. OPA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James M. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Parker v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. SartiniOhio Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API