Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 1999No. C4-98-635PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
In this criminal matter involving charges of aiding and abetting the filing of false landfill abatement fee reports, appellant Robert Dale Miller challenges the admissibility of a statement he made to law enforcement during the execution of a search warrant at appellant’s place of employment on the grounds that the statement was taken in violation of Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct 4.2 (MRPC 4.2) prohibiting an attorney from communicating with an opposing party known to be represented by counsel without obtaining the consent of the party’s attorney. Following…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, United States of America v. Jose Orlando LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MaloneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining MaoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HerreraSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James M. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.