Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sartini

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2007No. 2007-0337PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This court admitted respondent Thomas L. Sartini of Jefferson, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0001937, to the practice of law in Ohio in 1975. We admitted respondent, Ariana E. Niemi, a.k.a. Tarighati, of Jefferson, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039372, to the practice of law in Ohio in 1987. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we publicly reprimand respondents because they caused a criminal defendant’s mother to communicate a plea offer to the defendant outside the presence of and without the prior consent of the defendant’s counsel. On review,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James M. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. Monceret v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DeweyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. MakridisOhio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Toledo Bar Association v. Rehkopf.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API