Parker v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
“There is nothing more central to what it means to be a client in the American system of justice than to know that, having hired a lawyer, the client need not worry about being taken advantage of by lawyers, with special skills and training, who represent others.” ABA Comm, on Ethics and Profl Responsibility, Formal Op. 95-396 (1995). Plaintiffs claim that Defendant Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc. (“Pepsi”) and its counsel, John Kuenstler, of the law firm Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, willfully violated this principle when Kuen-stler…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Eleanor Schiessle v. Donald E. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, United States of America v. Jose Orlando LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Shane Weibrecht v. Southern Illinois Transfer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Longcrier v. HL-A CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
- Nieves v. OPA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. LinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Andrew Corp. v. Beverly Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Scanlan ex rel. Scanlan v. EisenbergDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.