Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James M. Box
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
Pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 35.11(2), the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board was granted permission to appeal from the findings and recommendations of the Grievance Commission concerning alleged disciplinary rule violations by the respondent attorney. The respondent attorney has cross-appealed from those findings and recommendations. Until now the matter has proceeded under the confidentiality provisions of Iowa Court Rule 35.11(2). Because we now conclude that public discipline is warranted, confidentiality is no longer required, and we refer to the respondent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Donald Eugene Ryans D/B/A Ryans Moving & Storage and Westside MoversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. PlumbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kathryn S. BarnhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. John W. GaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Dean A. StowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard R. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.