Legal Opinion

Wright v. Group Health Hospital

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1984No. 50801-1PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

The question presented in this appeal is whether, in connection with events leading to a medical malpractice action, a defendant hospital corporation may prohibit its current employees from conducting ex parte interviews with plaintiffs' attorneys. The trial court held these interviews would violate CPR DR 7-104(A)(l). We reverse.

I

This appeal arose out of plaintiffs' medical malpractice action pending against Group Health Hospital (Group Health) and Dr. Kevin Schaberg, its employee. In the malpractice action, plaintiffs allege defendant employees of Group Health, including Dr. Schaberg,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Coburn v. SedaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kadiak Fisheries Co. v. Murphy Diesel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CarmickWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Loudon v. MhyreWashington Supreme Court · 1988

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API