Legal Opinion

Forman v. Goldberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1941No. Civ. 6379PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiff brought this suit against her parents to declare a voluntary trust in property belonging to her. It was alleged and found that the defendant, Max Goldberg, obtained possession of the property by means of fraud; that he holds it in trust for his daughter and that he refused to account for or deliver the property to her. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of the property or the value thereof. From that judgment the defendants have appealed.

The defendants are husband and wife. The plaintiff is their daughter. She was married and has two children. Her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King v. UhlmannArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Laherty v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. De Felice v. TaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Hatch v. PenznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API