Lauricella v. Lauricella
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George C. Sargent, and Jos. F. Cavagnaro, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to establish and enforce an alleged constructive trust in land. Judgment was given for plaintiffs. Defendant moved for a new trial and the motion was denied. Defendant has appealed from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.
The facts, as stated in the findings, are as follows: Domenico Lauricella on July 11, 1906, was the owner of the two parcels of land in question. The plaintiffs were, respectively, his father and mother. The defendant was his wife. He had no children. On the day mentioned he conveyed said lands, by deed absolute on its face, to his wife, in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Matter of Will of O'HaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Day v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Tyre v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bradley Co. v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.