Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1936No. L. A. 15106PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea Well, J.

The court below sustained defendant’s demurrer to the first cause of action set forth in the second amended complaint without leave to amend. The complaint contained a second cause of action in the form of a common count for money had and received, to which defendant did not demur. From the judgment thereafter entered for defendant that plaintiff take nothing upon her complaint after the demurrer sustained to the first cause of action only, plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

We are of the view that the first cause of action was good against general demurrer. The allegations of said first cause…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hunter v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Truta v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API