Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Marshall
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1965No. Civ. 21333PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment declaring plaintiff to be the sole owner of certain real property in Santa Barbara subject to a lien in favor of defendants for reimbursements in the amount of $3,179.79.
The present action was commenced on November 9, 1954, by plaintiff against his mother Emily V. Marshall to impress a constructive trust on the subject property. Basically, the dispute between son and mother revolves about real property in Berkeley, California, known as the Casa Bonita Apartments, subsequently exchanged for the Santa Barbara property. The case has been tried three times.…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Urez Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Coppinger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.