Legal Opinion

De Felice v. Tabor

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1957No. Civ. 21992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

This is a paternity action in which the court, after trial without a jury, found that defendant is not the father of the child and rendered judgment in his favor. Plaintiff moved for a new trial and it was granted upon the ground of newly discovered evidence complying with the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure, section 657, subdivision 4. Defendant appeals from that order and plaintiff takes a cross-appeal from the judgment pursuant to rule 3 (a) of the Rules on Appeal.

The motion for new trial was made upon three specified grounds,—insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Arnold v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Horowitz v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Rosenberg v. WittenbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Lewetzow v. SapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API