Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Scott
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, C.
The appellees, who were the plaintiffs below, in their complaint say, that for fifteen years last past they have been and still are the owners of lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 in square 92, in the city of Indianapolis ; that said lots are contiguous to, and, on the south-east side thereof, for the distance of 600 feet, abut upon, Kentucky avenue, a public street in said city, and that, as the owners of said *31lots, they are also the owners in fee, and have been during said fifteen years, of that portion of said street, for said distance, lying between their said lots and the center line…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Swinney v. Ft. Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Dyckman v. . the Mayor, C. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- ROSS v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Stacey v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Chicago & Calumet Terminal Railway Co. v. Whiting, Hammond & East Chicago Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Porter v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Eichels v. Evansville Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.