Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago Railroad
Indiana Supreme Court
Eroin the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.
This was an action commenced by the appellant against the appellee. On demurrer to the complaint, there was judgment for the defendant, the court holding that the complaint was not sufficient, because it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. From this judgment the plaintiff appealed to this court, and he has assigned as error the sustaining of the. demurrer to his complaint. It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff is now, and has been *180for thirty years, the owner in fee simple of the following, described real estate, situated in the county of Tippecanoe,,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Williams v. . the New-York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Haynes v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Wager v. . Troy Union Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Milburn v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.