Legal Opinion
Eichels v. Evansville Street Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1881No. 8713PublishedCited by 26 opinions
From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The questions which this record presents are thus stated by the appellants’ counsel :
“1. Can a municipal corporation, by ordinance, authorize street railway companies to incumber its streets by laying and maintaining railroad tracks therein without express authority therefor by the Legislature?
“ 2. Has the corporation appellee obtained the necessary legislative sanction to authorize the laying down and maintenance of its track in the streets of the city of Evansville ?
“3. Can a street railway company, even with the proper legislative sanction, lay down and maintain its track in Second street,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Craig v. . Rochester City Brighton R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Attorney General v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Hobart v. Milwaukee City RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- May v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Lincoln Street Railway Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Magee v. OvershinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Chicago & Calumet Terminal Railway Co. v. Whiting, Hammond & East Chicago Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.