Legal Opinion

Porter v. Midland Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1890No. 14,498PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The material questions in this case arise upon the ruling of the trial court awarding the appellee judgment upon the special verdict. The facts contained in the verdict are these: On the 2d of April, 1872, the board of trustees of the town of Ladoga adopted a resolution licensing the Anderson, Lebanon and St. Louis Railroad Company to construct a railroad track along a street in the town, upon which street the appellant was an abutting owner. In the year 1873, the company named constructed a grade along the street, and for that purpose dug excava*477tions and built embankments. The grade was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Brookville & Metamora Hydraulic Co. v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. McMenaminSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  2. Stewart v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Shedd v. American Maize Products Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API