Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The first question, presented in various methods, which we are required to decide, is this: What must be done by a railroad company, engaged in constructing a new road, to entitle it, as of right, to build its track across the road of a company previously built?
There is no doubt as to the right of one railroad company, upon the payment of compensation, to construct its road across that of another road already inexistence, but the terms and conditions upon which it can be done are such as the law prescribes. Lewis Eminent Domain, section 268. A condition precedent to the right to cross is a…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- City of Clinton v. Cedar Rapids & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. DunlapMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Morrison v. Indianapolis & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- State Ex Rel. Bremerton Bridge Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Application of Loup River Public Power Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Bass v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.