Legal Opinion

Swinney v. Ft. Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati R. R.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Erom the Whitley Circuit Court.'

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

— Proceedings commenced in the Allen Circuit Court, hy the appellee, to appropriate certain lands belonging to the appellant, for railroad purposes, under “ An act to provide for the incorporation of railroad companies,” approved May 11th, 1852. 1 R. S. 1876, p. 696.

Sections 14 and 15 of the act are as follows:

“ Sec. 14. In case any company formed under this act, is unable to agree for the purchase of any real estate, in any county, required for the construction of the track, turn-outs, and water stations, it shall have the right to acquire the title to the same in the manner and by the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Henry v. Dubuque & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  3. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HornIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. White Water Valley Railroad v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore Railroad v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Cemetery Co. v. Warren School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Schnull v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Chicago, Indiana & Eastern Railway Co. v. Wysor Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API