Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Sikma
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.
This attorney disciplinary proceeding involves the conduct of attorney Robert L. Sikma in his handling of his business relationship with a client, Rashelle Katseres. The Grievance Commission found Sikma violated two disciplinary rules and recommended a three month suspension of his license to practice law. Based upon our de novo review of the record, we agree with the Commission’s conclusions and substantially adopt its recommended discipline.
I. Background facts and proceedings. Respondent Robert L. Sikma is an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Iowa…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PostmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. MershonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. OehlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. MarzenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. CarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. George Qualley IV and Thomas Karl BleyhlSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.