Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Postma
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
This disciplinary proceeding against Postma, the respondent attorney, resulted from transactions in a business corporation in which he had a personal interest. The commission for the most part rejected the committee’s charges but did recommend a reprimand. We granted the committee’s request to appeal. Upon our de novo review we find serious breaches of professional ethics which demand a suspension.
It is of course incumbent upon the committee to establish the violation by clear and convincing evidence. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Piazza, 405 N.W.2d 820, 821…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. MershonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HurdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PiazzaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. OehlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. RickabaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. WengerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HerreraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.