Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Carr
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CADY, Justice.
This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding. The claim involves a request by a lawyer for a bogus fee from a client, and the failure of the lawyer to subsequently account for the receipt of the money to his law firm. The grievance commission found the conduct constituted moral turpitude, as well as dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in violation of various disciplinary rules. It recommended revocation of the license to practice law. On our review, we agree with the findings and the recommended sanction of the commission.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Donald L.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BlomkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SikmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. ShifleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MattsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. PlumbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. GallnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David M. NelsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Brandon AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.