Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. George Qualley IV and Thomas Karl Bleyhl
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ZAGER, Justice.
The complainant, the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (Board), alleges the respondents, George Qualley IV and Thomas Bleyhl, violated numerous rules of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. The alleged violations arose out of a sequence of events occurring from 2008-2010. The Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa (commission) found Qualley and Bleyhl violated rules 32:1.4, 32:1.7, and 32:1.8. The commission recommended we suspend both Qualley and Bleyhl from the practice of law for thirty days. Upon our de novo review, we find both Qualley and Bleyhl…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric K. ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. MoonenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Larry Alan StollerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Cami N. EslickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Clay MendezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Dennis R. MathahsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth J. Weiland Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.