Legal Opinion

Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Oehler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 13, 1984No. 84-396PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

In this attorney disciplinary proceeding the respondent and the committee reached a stipulation on many of the facts and recommended a two-year suspension. Upon our de novo review of the entire record, including the stipulated facts, we find the respondent’s license should be revoked.

The facts are inordinately complex and not easily subject to narrative description. Superficially, it might seem that the complexity is suggested as a defense, as if the respondent could somehow find refuge from the complaint in the difficulty of searching out the facts. If so, there is no such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of FrerichsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Clinton Land Co. v. M/S ASSOCIATES, INC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. MershonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Goldman v. KaneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Koback v. CrookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kathryn S. BarnhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API