Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Marzen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 19, 2010No. 08-1546PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board alleged Jesse M. Marzen committed numerous violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct by engaging in a sexual relationship with a client, disclosing client confidences to the public, and making a misrepresentation to a judge. The grievance commission found there was insufficient evidence of an ethical violation on the charges of a sexual relationship with a client and a misrepresentation to a judge, but found Marzen violated disciplinary rules by disclosing client confidences. Upon our de novo review, we find Marzen…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DurhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HonkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SteffesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James W. McgrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth F. DolezalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Anthony Zane BlessumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Bruce G. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API