Stewart v. Sefton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
It is alleged in the complaint that on March 15, 1893, the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 28, township 16 south, range 1 west; on which day, and for a long time prior thereto, there were growing upon said land seventy-two lemon trees, the property of the plaintiff. That on said day “the defendant wrongfully entered upon said land, and willfully, knowingly, and maliciously, with full knowledge of the ownership of said property by plaintiff, dug up, removed, carried away, and converted to his own use the said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Helm v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Barnes v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Scott v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wickliffe v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833
- Dolde v. VodickaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Swall v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Crofoot Lumber, Inc. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Roche v. CasissaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Fick v. NilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.