Alden v. Mayfield
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. U. Goodman, for Plaintiff, appellant in No. 1944 and respondent in No. 1940. T. T. C. Gregory, for Defendant, respondent in No. 1944 and appellant in No. 1940.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued in ejectment to recover possession of certain property, which possession was withheld by defendant after service upon him of thirty days’ notice to quit. In separate counts and causes of action plaintiff sought to recover, besides the possession of the property, damages for its detention and the value of the rents and profits. (Sullivan v. Davis, 4 Cal. 291 ; Johnson v. Visher, 96 Cal. 310, [31 Pac. 106].).The admitted facts are that Victoria Alden, plaintiff, was the owner of a store in Suisun which the defendant had been occupying under a tenancy from month to month, paying…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hawthorne v. SiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- McDowell v. HymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnson v. VisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Overacre v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Taylor v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Linnard v. SonnenscheinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Miller v. ReidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Schumann v. KarrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.