Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876No. 4070PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Eighth Judicial District, County of Humboldt. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

The action is to recover treble damages for a trespass ' committed on the plaintiff’s land, by cutting down a large number of trees growing thereon; and is founded on section two hundred and fifty-one of the former Practice Act, which provides, in substance, that if any person shall cut down, girdle or injure any tree or timber on the land of another, or on the street or highway in front of another’s house, village or city lot, or on the commons or public grounds of any city or town, or on the street in front thereof, “without lawful authority,” he shall be liable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. IrbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  2. People v. . MolyneuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Whitecraft v. VanderverIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. People v. MolineuxNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Perkins v. HacklemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Morse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Weitz v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Gardner v. LovegrenWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dungan v. Superior Court of Fresno Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API