Legal Opinion

Forthmann v. Myer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1931No. Docket No. 8030PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRICKE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from the order made September 24, 1930, settling the first and final account of the guardian of an incompetent person and discharging the guardian, Charles A. Meyer, and particularly from those portions of the order allowing certain items of expense and guardian’s and attorney’s fees, and from the provision in the order declaring the amounts allowed to be a charge and lien against the estate of the ward.

Respondent has moved the dismissal of the appeal upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not filed within the time required by law. Appellant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Clanton v. CriteserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In re Estates of BeiselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Kahrs v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. People v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Bohn v. Mayor & City Council of FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Mamer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API