Legal Opinion

Russ-Field Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1958No. Civ. 23070PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

The questions presented by this appeal relate to the scope of the coverage of a rather special and unique contract of insurance issued by the Underwriters at Lloyds, London, and denominated “Feature Motion Picture Errors and Omissions Insurance for Studios and/or Distributors.” The trial court held that the claim which gave rise to the loss in question constituted a risk within the coverage of the policy and accordingly rendered judgment for plaintiff, the insured. The defendant insurance carriers have appealed.

Plaintiff, a producer of motion pictures, owned the motion picture rights to a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Walters v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. City Products Corp. v. Globe Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API