Russ-Field Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
The questions presented by this appeal relate to the scope of the coverage of a rather special and unique contract of insurance issued by the Underwriters at Lloyds, London, and denominated “Feature Motion Picture Errors and Omissions Insurance for Studios and/or Distributors.” The trial court held that the claim which gave rise to the loss in question constituted a risk within the coverage of the policy and accordingly rendered judgment for plaintiff, the insured. The defendant insurance carriers have appealed.
Plaintiff, a producer of motion pictures, owned the motion picture rights to a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Walters v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- City Products Corp. v. Globe Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.