Legal Opinion

Metadure Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 15, 1984No. Nos. 463-81C, 36-82CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

The issue presented on review under the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 (1982), is the finality to be accorded two decisions of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “ASBCA”). The first decision dismissed three appeals with prejudice and entered a preclusive order preventing Metadure Corporation (“plaintiff”) from introducing evidence to contest a default termination. The second decision awarded Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Contract Administration Services Region, New York (“DCASR”), $208,961.62 on its claim of overpayment through progress…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Griffin & Dickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Mileikowsky v. Tenet HealthsystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Jo-Mar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  4. White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Anchor Estates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API