Legal Opinion
Mileikowsky v. Tenet Healthsystem
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 2005No. B168705PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*537Opinion
CURRY, J.
Appellant Gil N. Mileikowsky, M.D., held staff privileges with respondent Encino-Tarzana Regional Medical Center (the Hospital) until it terminated those privileges.1 More precisely, the Hospital determined not to reappoint Dr. Mileikowsky to staff in January 2000, a decision that permitted Dr. Mileikowsky to continue working there while a hearing on the denial took place. Then, in November 2000, the Hospital summarily suspended his staff privileges, which immediately cut off his use of its facilities.
California law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 805 et seq.) codifies a physician’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Caryl Richards, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Mileikowsky v. West Hills Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Marcario v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Eight Unnamed Physicians v. Medical Executive CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lee v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.