Legal Opinion
Griffin & Dickson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 28, 1990No. 57-86 CPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RADER, Judge.
In this last chapter in a long history of litigation, plaintiff, Griffin and Dickson, seeks approximately $96,775.64 in attorney fees and other expenses from the Government under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1988). Plaintiff incurred these costs before this court and the Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals (the AGBCA or Board).
This court grants plaintiff’s EAJA application in the amount of $33,724.43. Defendant has not substantially justified the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) motions to dismiss before the Board.
FACTS
In…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hines ex rel. Sevier v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Neal & Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Joan Caves v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.