Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 18, 1984No. 22-HPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
The issue for decision is whether all the claims in Docket No. 22-H that have been, or could be, made by plaintiff White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona (“plaintiff”) should be dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to obey orders of the court. Necessarily included within this decision is the issue whether some lesser or different sanction is appropriate.
*576FACTS
The background of this matter has been set forth in two published orders: White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 575 (1984) (order imposing exclusionary sanction) (“White Mountain…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Davis v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hector Andres Marroquin-Manriquez v. The Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tsekouras v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.