Legal Opinion
Jo-Mar Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 14, 1988No. 75-87 CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Jo-Mar, a corporation, with its principal place of business in Suffolk, Virginia, filed a government contract claim in the United States Claims Court against the United States. In an unusually crafted Complaint, plaintiff appears to allege that as a result of government-induced changes to the contract requirements, delays, additional work and harassment, it is entitled to an equitable adjustment of the contract price.
In response, the government filed a Motion to Dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. United Continental Tuna Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southwest Marine, Inc., on Behalf of Universal Painting and Sandblasting Corp. v. United States of America and the United States Department of NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Vincent Schickler, TMD U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Bowers Investment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Marshall Associated Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.