Legal Opinion
Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 4, 1952No. 180PublishedCited by 982 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
delivered the opinion of the Court. .
The C-O-Two Fire Equipment Company, the respondent here, owns two patents, one issued on November 23, 1948, and the other reissued on August 23, 1949, for squeeze-grip valves and discharge heads for portable fire extinguishers. C-O-Two, incorporated in Delaware, has offices in Newark, New Jersey. On January 17, 1950, it commenced in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois an action against the Acme Equipment Company for “making and causing to be made and selling and using” devices which were charged with infringing C-O-Two’s patents.
On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Graham & the Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Remington Products Corp. v. American Aerovap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by982 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
977 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.